Foregrounding is the part of a scene or representation that is nearest to and
in front of the spectator. Though foregrounding theory was developed to
understand responses to both literature and film, empirical research
concentrated exclusively on reader response, until now. The present article
examines whether `literariness' in film causes the same effects as those
established for literature. In two experiments participants were shown one
scene from Shakespeare film adaptations, either low or high in foregrounded
elements. It was expected that showing these materials twice would reveal
differences in levels of foregrounding effects. It was found that seeing
high-foregrounding scenes twice was more enjoyable and made spectators perceive
more significant aspects than the low-foregrounding versions of the same scenes
did. A third experiment examined the extent to which a foregrounding effect
requires spectators' awareness of a `background'.
Participants in the experimental group were
shown a conventional dinner scene (background) before they saw an
unconventional one. The control group saw the same unconventional scene but
first a (conventional) shootout scene. Results showed that the unconventional
scene was considered more interesting and drew participants' attention more in
the experimental group than in the control group. Also, the first group
concentrated more on form aspects of the scene than the control group. These
results present strong evidence that deviation leaves clear traces of
foregrounding effects in spectators' responses.
No comments:
Post a Comment